AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/071
Department of High risk pregnancy and Perinatology, Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
*Corresponding Author: Nina Navakumar, Department of High risk pregnancy and Perinatology, Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Citation: Madhuri S., Navakumar N.*, Ranganayaki V. (2021) Varicella infection during pregnancy- maternal and fetal outcome; case series and analysis in a tertiary centre in South India! . J.Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences. 5(4): DOI: 10.31579/2578-8965/071
Copyright: © 2021, Manu Goyal, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 19 April 2021 | Accepted: 21 April 2021 | Published: 10 May 2021
Keywords: varicella infection; pregnancy; maternal; fetal; outcome
Background: This is a retrospective study undertaken to analyse the maternal and fetal outcome of varicella infection during pregnancy.
Methods: This is a retrospective observational study done in Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, a tertiary care hospital in South India. Sixty nine women infected with chickenpox during pregnancy from January 2009 to February 2018 (9 years) were taken for the study.
Results: The incidence of chickenpox during pregnancy in our study was 33.7 in 10000 pregnancies. There were no spontaneous miscarriages. The incidence of congenital anomalies was 7.2% and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 6.5 %, there was no statistical significance (p- 0.99). The incidence of preterm labour was 4.7% and when compared to the overall obstetric population in which the incidence was 15 %, there was a statistically significant less incidence (p- 0.035). The incidence of polyhydramnios was 4.7% and when compared to the overall obstetric population in which the incidence was 1%, there was a statistically significant increased incidence (p - 0.018). The incidence of fetal growth restriction was 13% and when compared to the overall obstetric population in which the incidence was 12.4%, there was no statistically significant difference (p- 0.963)
Conclusions: The maternal and fetal complications with chickenpox infection during pregnancy were more when infected in the first trimester. Early treatment, screening and followup will reduce the maternal and fetal morbidity
Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by varicella zoster virus of the herpes family. It is transmitted primarily from person to person by airborn respiratory droplets and by direct inoculation into the mucous membranes or the conjunctiva. While generally mild and of short duration in healthy children, varicella can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and neonates.1 Incidence of chickenpox in pregnancy is about 1-5 per 1000 pregnancies.2 Infection early in gestation can cause more severe damage or still birth.[1]Spontaneous miscarriage doesn’t appear to be increased if chickenpox occurs in first trimester. Fetal effects of varicella can manifest as either congenital varicella syndrome or neonatal varicella. Peripartum exposure of baby to the virus may lead to neonatal varicella.3 IUGR and low birth weight are found in some cases.4 This study is taken to know the maternal and fetal outcome of varicella infection in pregnancy.
This is a retrospective study done in Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences, Trivandrum, a tertiary care hospital in south india. The study has been approved by the institutional ethical committee. Data over a period of nine years i.e from January 2009 to February 2018 was taken from the Department of High risk obstetrics. Pregnant women infected with chickenpox, both booked and referred cases were taken into the study. There were 69 cases of varicella infection in pregnancy during this nine year period. The diagnosis of infection was done clinically. Out of these 69 women, 15 were lost for follow up at different periods of gestation. These 15 women were contacted by phone and the date needed was collected.
From January 2009 to February 2018, there were 69 women infected with chickenpox during pregnancy. The incidence of chickenpox during pregnancy over this nine year period in our study was 33.7 in 10000 pregnancies. Out of the 69 pregnant women, 64 were booked cases and 4 were referred from outside. 75.3 % women were of the age group 19-29 yrs. 24.63 % of the women were of the age group 30-40 yrs. The mean age of the patients was 27 years. Of the 69 cases of chickenpox complicating pregnancies, 59.4 % of the cases were primigravida, 34.7% were second gravida and 5.8% were third gravida. Of the 69 women, three women were lost for follow up. 35 women were infected with chickenpox in their first trimester, 28 in second trimester and 6 in the third trimester. (Table 1) 57 women were treated with acyclovir and 12 women were not treated with acyclovir and instead had taken homeopathy/ayurveda / no treatment.
50.7 % of women were infected with chickenpox in their first trimester, 40.57 % in second trimester and 8.7 % in the third trimester.
Out of the 69 women with chickenpox during pregnancy, three women had polyhydramnios, one women had preterm labour, 1 women had postvaricella cerebellitis at 18wks gestation, two women had threatened preterm labour at 31 weeks and 34weeks gestation which was managed with tocolysis.(Table 2)
Out of the 69 women with chickenpox during pregnancy, three women had polyhydramnios, one women had preterm labour, 1 women had postvaricella cerebellitis at 18wks gestation, two women had threatened preterm labour at 31 weeks and 34 weeks gestation which was managed with tocolysis.
Five women had congenital anomalies in the ultrasound done for evaluating for anomalies after infection with varicella. One fetus had left leg talipes, one had congenital diaphragmatic hernia, one had posterior urethral valve along with atrioventricular canal defect, one fetus had fetal hydrops and one fetus had multiple anomalies like hydrocephalus, ventricular septal defect, bilateral talipes, hand fixed flexion deformity. Seven fetus had fetal growth restriction in which one fetus was with congenital diaphragmatic hernia and one with multiple anomalies mentioned above. One fetus had fetal growth restriction with abnormal Doppler. In one women who was carrying a MCDA twin pregnancy, selective fetal growth restriction and Twin Twin Transfusion Syndrome Stage II was found. The woman who developed postvaricella cerebellitis at 18wks gestation had undergone a scan at 23 wks gestation which showed fetal growth restriction and later she was lost for follow up. The women whose fetus had posterior urethral valve with atrioventricular canal defect and one with fetal hydrops were lost for follow up. Out of 66 fetus, six had congenital varicella.(Table 3)
There were no spontaneous miscarriages in first trimester in our study. The incidence of congenital anomalies was 7.2% and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 6.5 %, there was no statistical significance in the incidence of congenital anomalies as the p value is 0.99 ( > 0.05). The incidence of preterm labour was 4.7% although out of three women, in two women preterm labour was successfully managed with tocolysis and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 15 %, there was a statistically significant less incidence of preterm labour in our study as the p value is 0.035 (< 0.05). The incidence of polyhydramnios was 4.7% and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 1%, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of polyhydramnios in our study as the p value is 0.018 ( < 0.05). The incidence of fetal growth restriction was 13% and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 12.4%, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of fetal growth restriction in our study as the p value is 0.963 ( > 0.05).The incidence of low birth weight was 9.5% and when compared to the overall obstetric population of the nine year study period in which the incidence was 26%, there was a statistically significant less incidence of low birth weight in our study as the p value is 0.004 ( < 0.05).(Table 4)
*statistically significant at 5%level
8.8% of fetus of women infected in the first trimester had congenital anomalies. 7.1% of fetus of women infected in the second trimester had congenital anomalies. 16.7% of fetus of women infected in third trimester had congenital anomalies. Out of three women who had polyhydramnios, two were infected in the first trimester and one was infected in the second trimester. Out of three women who had preterm labour two women were infected in the first trimester and one women was infected in the second trimester. One women who was infected in the first trimester had post-varicella cerebellitis. (Table 5)
Out of 35 women infected in first trimester, four fetus had FGR. Of those infected in second trimester, one had FGR, one had FGR with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, one had fgr with abnormal doppler and one had selective FGR with TTTS which was a a twin pregnancy. Out of six women infected in third trimester, one fetus had FGR. Out of sixty nine women, thirty five delivered vaginally, two delivered with vacuum and twenty six women had cesarean section for various indication. (Table 6)
One woman had undergone medical terminations of pregnancy even after her anomaly scan was normal, due to the fear of associated fetal anomalies with varicella. One woman had undergone termination for FGR with multiple anomalies and another woman with twin pregnancy had undergone termination of pregnancy for selective fetal growth restriction and TTTS stage II. The mean gestational age at delivery (SD) was 38 weeks (1.5). Five babies had low birth weight, one baby had low birth weight along with respiratory distress syndrome and glottic synechia. One baby had left leg talipes, one had left undescended testis, one had patent ductus arteriosus and one had ventricular septal defect. (Table 7)
Varicella during pregnancy can lead to maternal infection, intrauterine infection or perinatal infection when the primary disease occurs in the mother around the time of delivery. The incidence of chickenpox during pregnancy in our hospital over this nine years period of study was 33.7 in 10000 pregnancies. This increased incidence would be partially attributed to the high rates of referrals to our hospital as it is a tertiary centre. Two out of the twelve women whose fetus had congenital varicella were not treated with antivirals during their infection with chickenpox virus. The effects of chickenpox infection would have been reduced if antiviral treatment was started soon after the appearance of rash. One woman had undergone termination of pregnancy even after her targetted anomaly scan was normal, due to the fear of associated fetal anomalies and complications with varicella during pregnancy. There is a need for widespread awareness among the patients that prompt treatment, regular screening and followup will reduce the maternal and fetal morbidity due to chickenpox infection during pregnancy and the tendency to undergo termination of pregnancy due to fear of fetal ill effects should be avoided.
Of the six women whose fetus had congenital varicella, three women were infected in the first trimester and three women in the second trimester. In a large series with 1373 pregnancies infected with chickenpox during pregnancy in united kingdom and germany, they found that fetal disease occurred most commonly between 13 and 20 weeks.5 In our study, the incidence of congenital varicella was 9% excluding the women lost for followup. This high incidence can be explained by the higher incidence of cases reported to our hospital as said above. Although the reported risks of embryopathy after maternal infection with varicella virus range from 0 5 to 9.2 % 6 above the base-line level of risk, this range is derived from small studies.7There is a need for the study of the maternal and fetal effects of chickenpox during pregnancy on a larger sample.
The incidence of preterm labour was 4.5 % in our study. Three women went into preterm labour, in which only one delivered premature fetus and for one elective cesarean was done at 34 wks gestation in view of bad obstetric history with previous cesarean section. The women who had preterm labour at 31wks gestation delivered a 1.16kg baby. Two out of the three women were infected in first trimester and the other women contracted the infection at 23 wks of gestation. This explains the increased predisposition to preterm labour if the women has been infected in the first trimester. There was a trend toward more premature births among the patients who contracted varicella in the first 20weeks with an incidence of 5.6%.7There were no cases of varicella pneumonia in our study. One women who was infected in the first trimester had postvaricella cerebellitis. Our study shows that there were more maternal complications when the infection occurred in the first trimester with 14.3 % of women infected in the first trimester who had maternal complications.
There was an increased incidence of polyhydramnios, no difference in incidence of preterm labour and low birth weight in our study when compared to the overall obstetric population whereas there was no change in the incidence of fetal growth restriction and congenital anomalies independently. There were no cases of neonatal varicella. Hence the maternal and fetal complications with chickenpox infection during pregnancy were more when the women were infected in the first trimester. Pre pregnancy immunization with varicella virus vaccine will decrease the incidence of chickenpox infection during pregnancy. There is a need for universal immunization in childhood and pre-pregnancy if not immunized in childhood and has not contracted the disease before pregnancy.
We thank all those who have have been part of this study and also for the support and guidance.
None
Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest
Ethical approval: This retrospective observational study has been conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution.
We thank all those who have have been part of this study and also for the support and guidance.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
